De Moray was not idle whilst all this unfolded, having burnt the Castle of Duffus, and then moved to Boharm, to await the oncoming English army. His forces positioned themselves on a wooded hillside above a ford on the River Spey, and waited to ambush their foes. On seeing the size of the force sent against them, they decided to withdraw without battle, and shadowed the array from Elgin to Inverness.

Safe for the time being within the walls of Inverness Castle, Edward's cohorts gathered to themselves the remaining forces in the Highlands still considered loyal to his cause, principally Sir William de Fitzwarine, Constable of Urquhart Castle, John of the Aird, and the Countess of Ross, with their respective feudal retainers. Here again, as with the Comyns and Mar, the enthusiasm of these new recruits for the task at hand was doubtful.

Aberdeenshire had been left denuded of English forces whilst all this had been going on, and the Scots there rose against the invaders. The Comyns and Sir Gartenet of Mar readily agreed to abandon the mission against their kinsman and set out with their followers for Aberdeen.

Andrew de Moray watched the last of the English forces leave Inverness, and immediately set about recapturing the castles held for Edward in the region, including Inverness, Urquhart, Nairn, Forres and Elgin. They even captured Sir Reginald le Chen, Edward's guardian of Moray, and held him prisoner for a time.

Aberdeen fell to the rebels, the Scots were in complete control of the north east, and all the direct result of Andrew de Moray's brave actions.The Lothians were now under English control, and Robert Bruce, with Sir WilliamDouglas, Sir Alexander Lindsay,

Wallace and his army then marched south again to lay siege to Dundee, which was more stoutly defended than either Perth or Aberdeen. It was at this point, in August of 1297, that Earl Warrene bestirred himself at Edward's urging to bring the Scottish uprising to an end.

He assembled a large army of mounted knights and foot soldiers and marched for Stirling, intending to reinforce this very strategic and nearly impregnable fortress and thence to relieve the siege of Dundee. On hearing that the English army was marching north from the borders, Wallace took most of his men and departed the siege, leaving Alexander Scrymgeour and a small force behind to finish the job.

Wallace and de Moray must have been in constant communication as these events unfolded, probably with the assistance of the Scottish churchmen who played such an important role in the War of Independence. The two armies joined together at some point (time and place still unknown) and took up battle positions north of the Forth near Stirling.

Most historians attribute the strategy of the battle to young Andrew de Moray. While this is pure speculation, there is some reason to believe it was de Moray who positioned the Scottish forces to take advantage of the bridge and swampy ground where the English army went down.

Pitched battle was not Wallace's way; he was a guerrilla fighter. De Moray, in spite of his youth and lack of direct experience, would perhaps have known more about large battle strategy as a member of the high nobility. Wallace's poor choice of ground at Falkirk a year later is often cited as proof that it was de Moray who worked out the battle plan at Stirling Bridge.

Whatever the case, the two commanders carried Scotland on their youthful shoulders on that day, 11 September, 1297. They had little support from the magnates of Scotland. They had only a smattering of lesser nobles and a large force of the commoners of the realm to command.

With 13,000 heavy horse and 60,000 foot, the English forces should have easily carried the day against the ragtag forces of de Moray and Wallace. However, the arrogance of the corpulent churchman Cressingham overruled the cautious deliberations of Warrene, and the cavalry crossed the bridge to be slaughtered at the hands of the highly motivated Scots.

The hated Cressingham was among the fallen English on that day, and it is well known that, after the battle when his obese corpse was discovered among the dead, the Scots mutilated his body and stripped it of his skin. The Lanercost Chronicler maintains that, "Of his skin William Wallace caused a large strip to be taken from the head to the heel, to make therewith a baldrick for his sword."

How de Moray received the fatal wound he incurred during the battle is not recorded, but it is known that he lived for several weeks after the battle. Nor is it on record that he attended the Scottish council at Perth in October where he and Wallace were jointly named "leaders of the army of the realm of Scotland." Both received their knighthood at around this point also, presumably in recognition of their services to Scotland at this fatal juncture.

It was also during this period that the famous letter bearing both leaders' signatures went out to the mayors of Lubeck and Hamburg, informing those cities that Scotland had been "recovered by war from the power of the English". Her ports were once more open to the trade which had flourished prior to Edward's usurpation. Two additional letters under joint signature went out from Hexham on 7th November 1297. In all three letters, the order of the names appears the same: "Andrew de Moray and William Wallace, leaders of the army of the kingdom of Scotland." The name of Andrew de Moray no longer appears after this date, and it is to be assumed that he died shortly thereafter.

Wallace left to carry the war to the English. Andrew's father and uncle were still held in the Tower of London during the revolt in the north, both of them dying there under conditions of extreme severity imposed by Edward. Another of young Andrew's uncles served the rebellion admirably in the person of David de Moravia, who, as a member of the "church militant" rose quickly from a parson of Bothwell in 1296 to Bishop of Moray in 1299.

He figured prominently, along with Bishop Lamberton, in the story of Robert the Bruce. And, finally, de Moray left a son who fought valiantly and effectively against Edward III when he renewed his grandfather's quest to reduce Scotland to a vassal state of England.

There is no doubt that Andrew de Moray, had he lived to continue the struggle, would have shared the spotlight with Wallace, and perhaps even have eclipsed Wallace as the leading hero of the Scottish War of Independence.

He is directly responsible for the heroic uprising in the north, indirectly responsible for the overthrow of the English in Aberdeenshire, and one of two great leaders who defeated English chivalry at the Battle of Stirling Bridge.

Information derived from "The Scottish Wars of Independence", by Evan Macleod Barron, published in 1914.